5-Day Assessment: Breaking the EU/Korea Salesforce AI Stalemate
When EU standards collide with KR reality, the cost isn't code—it's undecided architecture, unclear owners, and stalled SIs. In one week, you leave with decisions called, risks surfaced, and a board-ready 90-day plan your SI can execute under guardrails.
Advisory-only • Works with your current SI • Agentforce & Data Cloud focus • Fixed scope & time-boxed
Is this you?
EU HQ CDO / Global Head of CRM
Korea in scope this quarter with board visibility required.
Korea GM / COO / CIO
Demanding outcomes on Korean timelines without breaking HQ standards.
Program Challenges
Multi-SI program, privacy-sensitive data, competing roadmaps, and "more dashboards, same adoption."
Your dream state
One sponsor + backup, named decision rights, directional target architecture, data contracts before dashboards, and a governance cadence your teams actually run.
What you walk away with (in 5 days)
Go/No-Go Decision
Clear rationale and path forward, backed by data.
Risk Heatmap
With owners identified and time-boxed mitigations.
Board-Ready 90-Day Plan
That your SI can execute under defined guardrails.
Architecture Direction
For Agentforce/Data Cloud (identity, consent, golden profile SLAs).
Decision rights & change-control design (RACI-lite)
Data-contract sketch (identity, consent, golden profile SLAs)
90-day plan + risk heatmap + KPI sketch
Executive read-out pack you can share
Not included: configuration, custom code, data migration, UAT, PMO, vendor procurement, legal opinions, production credentials/PII handling. Your SI builds under guardrails.
Acceptance criteria (how we move fast): sponsor + backup named; decision slots booked with 48-hour SLA; SI lead engaged; change-orders logged for anything outside scope.
Stop re-litigating architecture and change-control.
Leader-visible cadence
Decision/dissent logs and KPIs on one page.
Time-box pressure
One week to align, commit, and move.
"When weeks of discussion become days of decision, implementation actually happens."
Micro-FAQ
Do you implement?
No. Advisory-only. Your SI executes faster under clear guardrails.
Security & privacy posture?
We work through your tools and access; no production credentials or customer PII. GDPR/PIPA alignment; your counsel owns legal interpretation. See Data & Consent.
How soon can we start?
If sponsor + SI lead are named, assessment weeks typically start within 2–3 weeks.
What if we need deeper design?
Add the Architecture Blueprint (2–3 weeks) after the assessment to finalize target architecture, data contracts, and scorecard spec.
2-Step Booking (Fast Path)
Step 1 — Qualify (1 minute)
Identify sponsor + backup, markets in scope (KR + …), SI lead, primary blocker (identity/consent/change-control/adoption), quarter deadline, preferred week(s).
Step 2 — Calendar
Lock the week; receive the briefing checklist & one-slide pack to align your sponsor and SI lead.